Published on June 17th, 2012 | by G. Bargas, Managing Editor5
Editorial: Microsoft SmartGlass is Dumb: Why Second Screen Gaming Should Stay on the Wii U
Okay, okay, you’re not completely sold on the Wii U. You don’t want anything to do with Nintendo’s next-gen console because you can’t wait for the Xbox 720 or PS4 or any other hideous non-likely names that would ever make it to the final product.
Second screens have been long acknowledged by desktop users. That second screen allows you to game and surf the web on the fly. Heck, you can edit photos and watch how-to videos while picking songs to stream simultaneously–all on the same computer. This expanded desktop experience has allowed for more virtual desk space, but SmartGlass takes it one step further. It brings transparency to your experience. Wait, didn’t the Wii U already do that?
Nintendo’s Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing Scott Moffitt had an interesting comment for Forbes.com at this year’s E3.
This was taken from the article that can be found on Forbes.com.
“With Wii, when we brought out motion controls and introduced that as a new idea in gaming, initially there were people who didn’t understand it. Three years later, our competitors both came out with their own motion control systems,” he said, referring to Xbox Kinect and Playstation Move.
“We announced second screen gaming last year, and it’s somewhat flattering that it only took people a year this time around,” he continued.
More seriously, he said, Smart Glass just doesn’t look like a peripheral for a games system. Microsoft may have used TV shows and IMDB to showcase Smart Glass, but as far as games go, gamers trying to incorporate SmartGlass into play sessions may find themselves limited by their number of hands.
“I’m not sure how, as a gamer, I would manipulate a second screen with most hands on my controller,” says Moffitt. “We don’t have three hands, unfortunately.”
The results from the prior pioneering on Nintendo’s part has left other companies to follow suite. For starters, the PlayStation Move was a blatant tap into the Nintendo design. From a business perspective, I do feel that competitive markets such as these breed new life into the technology. Look how many devices now include gyroscopes and motion controls. All of which give an extra dimension to gamers. Now the next dimension is a transparent desktop or “screen” that allows you to not abide by the day old rule of needing a TV to play.
The Wii U implements the technology and does it well. There is much room for the company to grow by providing tablet-like features into a bundle that could be wrapped up together for the regular price of a tablet. The Wii U Gamepad also brings something that I can’t stand about gaming on a tablet, which is having a controller or physical buttons. Having to pinch, tap or tilt for moves gets old quickly, particularly as graphics and power continue to improve on these devices.
I can see where SmartGlass can be a great extender of entertainment and other features. Cool, let’s grab some music and queue it up. Sure, I’d like to see information about the video that is playing on screen. Great. But, don’t expect me to want to play a FPS or strategy game with my iPad or Galaxy tab.
So, who deserves this tech? Which implementation is right? I think the answer is obvious–and it doesn’t require an extra hand to use properly.